by Ender Wiggin
↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
Do we think a new base game edition will come out? Or just the expansion?
↧
↧
Reply: Pandemic Legacy: Season 1:: Sessions:: Re: Finally beginning the campaign, and as exciting as hoped... (January spoilers)
by Dexter345
LeonardQuirm wrote:
I would have just preferred it if two of them weren't adjacent cities in the middle of C0Da territory...still, I'm sure that'll be fine, right?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
by phaelen2003
Anyone else notice that says Avalon Hill and not WOTC?My guess is that it's a standalone that expands base as well?
Oh man oh man oh man. this is so exciting!!!
↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
by IdleHacker
phaelen2003 wrote:
Anyone else notice that says Avalon Hill and not WOTC?
but it's hosted on WOTC's website...
↧
↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
by ianoble
Wish there were a bunch of new characters, but still, pretty cool to see new content.↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
by DoomTurtle
phaelen2003 wrote:
Anyone else notice that says Avalon Hill and not WOTC?
My guess is that it's a standalone that expands base as well?
Oh man oh man oh man. this is so exciting!!!
My guess is that it's a standalone that expands base as well?
Oh man oh man oh man. this is so exciting!!!
The web page mentions you must have the base game in order to use this expansion. Also, there are definitely not enough components to be able to use it on its own.
↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
by BigDumbYak
Scrotos wrote:
So excited for this. Do we have a release date yet?
Gizmodo is quoting October 14th as the release date.
↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
by mopic42
Scrotos wrote:
So excited for this. Do we have a release date yet?
According to:
http://toyland.gizmodo.com/betrayal-at-the-house-on-the-hill...
The release date is October 14th.
↧
↧
Thread: Pandemic Legacy: Season 1:: Rules:: End of first March game SPOILERS
by mesimorpa
My group lost our first game in March and forgot to resolve the "At the end of your first game in March, before selecting your game end upgrades, open the following doors and then draw this card."My question is: should we resolve this card before we begin our second March session (even though we selected our upgrades) or just wait until the end of that session?
No spoilers, please!
↧
Reply: Pandemic Legacy: Season 1:: Rules:: Re: End of first March game SPOILERS
Go ahead and open it. You would be able to plan for it anyway.
↧
New Video for Pandemic Legacy: Season 1
by FantasyNerd8
<div></div>
↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
by etherton
Wonder if they'll include a replacement Underground Lake tile for those of us with the first printing?↧
↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
by bkarrigan
Yeah, I hope it's compatible w/ first edition...↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
by Snycher
Hype levels at maximum. One of my favorite board games, especially for the price it usually floats at (35-40). 50 new haunts!!! So damn excited!!!!!!!↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
by Mandor
etherton wrote:
Wonder if they'll include a replacement Underground Lake tile for those of us with the first printing?
Odd... I was hoping for a replacement Underground Lake for the second printing. Much more fun having it on the second floor.
↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
by JesterPoet
BigDumbYak wrote:
Scrotos wrote:
So excited for this. Do we have a release date yet?
Gizmodo is quoting October 14th as the release date.
WOOOOO! My birthday!
↧
↧
Reply: Betrayal at House on the Hill:: News:: Re: A expansion is coming in fall of 2016
by dermaestro
So excited for this. Totally worth getting as a late birthday gift for me.↧
Reply: Pandemic Legacy: Season 1:: General:: Re: Reasons I Won't Be Playing This
by newtsmelt
It sounds like you are being very rigid on treating this like a standard board game, rather than what it also is, an experience. I was never a big fan of Pandemic and I have not played Pandemic Legacy, but I look at it as an experience. If I were to play it, I would definitely split it with friends and it would be less than $15 a person for 12 - 20 games (as I understand it, which is more than reasonable). You have surely paid for experiences before (concerts, shows, movies, comedy events, park admissions, etc.) and not thought too much of it because you saw it as an experience. It sounds like you really want to play this game, but don't want to because it sounds like a bad deal for a board game (even though it sounds like a really good deal for an experience). And yes, one could argue that all boardgames provide for experiences, but you won't experience this game because you are concerned that it can be re-experienced...The point: If you treat it as an experience rather than a standard board game, it is not at all a bad deal.
↧
Reply: Pandemic Legacy: Season 1:: General:: Re: Reasons I Won't Be Playing This
by clydeiii
newtsmelt wrote:
It sounds like you are being very rigid on treating this like a standard board game, rather than what it also is, an experience. I was never a big fan of Pandemic and I have not played Pandemic Legacy, but I look at it as an experience. If I were to play it, I would definitely split it with friends and it would be less than $15 a person for 12 - 20 games (as I understand it, which is more than reasonable). You have surely paid for experiences before (concerts, shows, movies, comedy events, park admissions, etc.) and not thought too much of them because you saw them as experiences. It sounds like you really want to play this game, but won't because it sounds like a bad deal for a board game (even though it sounds like a really good deal for an experience). And yes, one could argue that all boardgames provide for experiences, but you won't experience this game because you are concerned that it can be re-experienced...
The point: If you treat it as an experience rather than a standard board game, it is not at all a bad deal.
The point: If you treat it as an experience rather than a standard board game, it is not at all a bad deal.
↧