by trimoe19
So after playing 14 games of Risk Legacy with the same group of 4 people the win track tallied 5 wins to Blake, 4 wins to Jason, 3 wins to Rob, and 2 wins for myself. Rob and myself decided that since it was the final game and the results determining who would get to name the world it would be best to let Jason win thus resulting in a tie and forcing more games to be played to name the world. This would allow Rob and I to try and obtain more wins and maybe getting back in the race.Halfway through game 15 I had a choice to win the game or keep it going and chose not to win. Blake sniffed out our motives and we told him the truth. We tried explaining our side but he wouldn't have it. He stormed off after he had been knocked out and Jason won on his next turn.
So I ask you is this fair or foul. Keep in mind at one point Jason was dominating South America with 2 major cities, 2 minor cities, and a mercenary sticker. We went behind his back and decided to scar his continent with [o]biohazard stickers[/o], putting 2 on there. But he did not complain he just kept playing. Also our second game, Jason could have won but chose not to knock me out instead and Blake won as a result. Just looking for opinions. Thanks.