by Detective
Dan R. wrote:
Once it goes above 2v2, the game bogs down, and turn order seems to determine success or failure more than player choice.
Thanks for the feedback!
2v2 is our favorite, but 3v3 isn't that bad in our groups usually. We do allow a fair amount of table talk for strategy, but no specific card discussion. (as border-line as that becomes sometimes...) Things like "Are you ready to go in?""Can you dish out some damage?""You good on defense?" All of this is heard by the other team, so you can always feint strong or weak as well.
Harkonnen13 wrote:
I think 2p is best but maybe 1/3 of my games were 4p. Never played more than 4.
Thanks for the feedback!
We felt that luck based situations cropped up too often with 1v1 - is there something you do that negates that fact or is that part of the fun? Trying to deal with poor luck in a game and scrap out a win? (well I guess, first off do you mean 1v1? I see that some like to play 1 player vs 1 player, each controlling 2 characters as well)