by jayahre
Becq wrote:
spidere wrote:
I am also curious about the answer to Slyght's question, as well as this one...
My group is playing that [o]the +2 gold increases the cost to hire the character regardless of how you choose to hire him. I haven't seen any official comments on this; this is just how we decided to rule it.[/o]
[o]If the province owner chooses to keep their +2 gold advisor at the end of the game, how does that affect the winner's choice of advisors? E.g., since "
The player who won this game may only keep an advisor if its gold value cost is lower than that of any other advisor kept by a player.", if the province owner keeps what would be a 2 gold advisor for others, but for them is a 4 gold advisor, would that prevent the game winner from keeping a 2 gold advisor?[/o]
My literal interpretation of this is that [o]the +2 sticker represents an additional surcharge for that specific player, and the "gold cost value" of the advisor hasn't actually changed.[/o]
The additional cost doesn't affect the gold value of the advisor, so it has no effect on end-game resolution.
It's simply an additional cost when that player wants to purchase that advisor - once the advisor is purchased, the cost can be considered non-existent (unless it makes its way back into the forum to be purchased again)