by mfaulk80
Antistone wrote:
mfaulk80 wrote:
We didn't have that many games where 3 incidents even occurred (27 incidents in 14 games). Diversion is cool if you're getting incidents, but our goal was to limit incidents before they happened.
If you rarely got to 3 incidents, but you received a "failing" evaluation in at least 2 games, this suggests you are giving too much priority to preventing incidents relative to your other goals. You're hoarding one resource while running out of another.
That's quite the assumption.
I'd argue that our biggest issue in our first loss was that we tried to complete every objective despite a bad initial start and a poor draw (relative to the objectives). We focussed too much on [o]creating checkpoints[/o] when we should've just focussed on the other two objectives. We hadn't failed any objectives up to that point....but we almost ended up failing all 3 that first half of the month (June) because we were so focussed on that [o]Pursuit[/o] objective. In the end....we lost due to incidents! It was a poorly played game that had some lasting repercussions.
I honestly don't remember much about our 2nd fail (July), but my point is that we didn't lose because we were too focussed on the incidents. We had other issues, and those losing months were actually when we were really hit hard with Incidents. In most months, we completed every objective and had very few (if any) incidents. This was especially true in the back half of the campaign.
